Multidimensional
When one person is talking about the mind and another about the brain, chances are they’re talking about the same thing, just from a different dimension.
The same goes for science and religion (yes, really).
Consciousness is nothing but spectacular. I’ve had two moments in my life where I understood consciousness — two seconds. All the other seconds I didn’t get it; I wasn’t in my best shape or the right mindset. Multidimensionality is something I hit only once.
The Bible explains multidimensional thinking very well. I’m not religious myself, but there are a lot of tools in religion that can help you understand it.
The first lines of Genesis are multidimensional. That means the text itself operates on multiple levels — multiple points of explanation that together form a line.
“The beginning” should really be “a beginning”. You start explaining from one point, and then you move step by step.
I start with two claims:
-
“I know what consciousness is.”
-
“I understand multidimensionality.”
Now I have to find my way back — the train of explanation.
“In the beginning, G (I removed the name because I don’t want to disrespect anybody) created the heavens and the earth.”
This essentially means:
At the beginning of an explanation, I need an “up” (heavens) and a “down” (earth). So, in order to explain to myself what I am, I first needed to create a 3D space. I started at a point of explanation, and I created 3D.
In contrast to the Big Bang theory, the explanatory part — the universe explaining things to itself — is more interwoven than simply a “bang.” It accounts for the reason behind the bang.
In that sense, there is a language hidden in the Bible — a language that only the greatest minds understand.
Another example: the story of Adam and Eve. This is a tale about growing up. Everyone who has paid attention has noticed the moment in life when you suddenly become aware of your sexuality. This happens in a single second. It drops into your consciousness, just like an apple falls from a tree. You suddenly become self-aware in that very second — aware that you, in a sense, are naked.
With great power comes great responsibility
Why knowledge is more important than evolution theory
The mistake you make is this: you think we evolved into humans with the capacity to communicate simply because of our large brains.
If you look at evolution theory alone, you get something like this:
Mechanical features (brain) → knowledge transfer → ideas
What you don’t understand is that it also works the other way around. By exchanging ideas, we literally change how we evolve, because the people with the right knowledge determine how the physical world — our hardware — develops.
Let’s take an indirect example. The people who possessed the knowledge of how to make fire influenced our evolutionary path: they caused humans to evolve into creatures with larger brains. In that sense, knowledge can literally change the way humans look. So the combination of obtaining knowledge and transferring it is more important for human development than evolution theory alone.
Imagine you are the first person to discover how to make fire. You have a choice: do you tell the rest of the tribe or not?
If you do, you indirectly change the way all humans will look, because you increase the likelihood that we evolve with smaller jaws and bigger brains.
Person A:
“I think you don’t really understand the theory of evolution. Knowledge and the transfer of knowledge are much more important, and you don’t see that in DNA. At every moment in time, different knowledge is needed.”
Person B:
“You don’t understand it at all. You’re talking about cultural evolution, but that is only possible because you evolved into something that can communicate.”
Person A:
“The theory of evolution is almost insignificant in explaining why some things survive and others don’t. A plant also influences the environment it lives in — it works both ways. It doesn’t just live in an environment.”
The invention of fire gave us smaller jaws and bigger brains.
This means that if you are the first one to discover fire and master it, you indirectly change the way all humans look.
For a moment, you are a higher power. With your idea and your skill, you have changed the physical world—our bodies—for good.
That is why ideas can shape physical reality.
That is why higher powers exist.
Back in the day, when people believed in different gods, they weren’t so wrong after all.
This is the circle you could call creation: we create our own physical bodies over time through our actions.
Evolution theory is a natural way to temper this idea a little
You could say: it only works if large groups of people actually cook and outcompete others who don’t, in terms of the number of children they have. You could also say that the fact someone could master fire is the result of evolution. This is, of course, partly true.
But some people recognize skill in others—the elegance of obtaining knowledge, the courage to try, and the mastery of a skill. They respect that in each other.
V
PS, a small nuance: the beauty of fire is, of course, that it already existed. It was first observed, but someone learned to master it.
What people generally underestimate
is the idea that controlling fire, or any other scientific invention or discovery, was not bound to happen. It feels unimaginable that these things wouldn’t have occurred—but someone still had to do it.
To control fire, for example, you first have to believe that you can create fire yourself, which is completely different from merely observing it. There was no way you could have known it was possible. It’s much harder than it seems.
Or think of it this way: there are millions and millions of things like fire that have not yet been discovered.